home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.genie.net!usenet
- From: i.einman@genie.com (IAN J. EINMAN)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: AMIGA Developer conference @ CeBIT 96
- Date: 22 Mar 1996 04:30:28 GMT
- Organization: via GEnie Services (1-800-638-9636 or info@genie.com)
- Sender: i.einman@genie.com (IAN J. EINMAN)
- Message-ID: <4itad4$kfr@rock101.genie.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: rock103.is.ge.com
-
- >>Though one third of the American immigrants a few hundred years ago were
- talking german, they missed the general decision to do so in the whole
- continent only by an inch. Otherwise we all would talk german now.
-
- That is very correct. The common languages in early US history were English, German,
- and Dutch, all common and very much a part of early American culture.
-
- Of the three, English won out, more than likely because it was easier to learn
- than its primary competitor at the time, German. This is relative: English and German are
- of the same language family, and considered to BOTH be difficult languages to learn
- relative to others in the world (Chinese is considered another very difficult one).
-
- It seems to be easier for Germans to learn English correctly than vice versa, maybe because
- they're smarter... but more likely because the only language more complicated than English seems
- to be German!
-
- English just became a de facto standard in the US, it was NEVER written into law in any way
- The main reason the the language the US uses is so popular may just be our location.
- We have historically had links with both Europe and Asia... so consequently, if
- a German wants to speak to a Chinese, they probably speak English.
-
- And I also send my condolences to the British, on behalf of my country, because even
- though they INVENTED the friggin' language, the butchered and altered American usage
- and spelling has permeated the world for better or worse... sorry :-)
-
-